Dec 06 2006

Democrats Negotiating In Secret With Hamas

Published by at 4:53 pm under All General Discussions,Bin Laden/GWOT

The Democrats are playing as very dumb and dangerous game by holding secret talks with terrorist organizations. 9-11 is not THAT distant of a memory. I am sure these modern Neville Chamberlains will come running back with all sorts of wonderfully naive promises of peace and happiness.

30 responses so far

30 Responses to “Democrats Negotiating In Secret With Hamas”

  1. crosspatch says:

    “Meanwhile, sources close to the Hamas-led government claimed that Hamas representatives recently held talks with officials from the US Democratic Party at a secret location.”

    Hey, wait a minute! Since when does a political party engage in talks with foreign governments? Isn’t that against the law or something?

  2. Sue says:

    I was about to mention that, CP.

  3. crosspatch says:

    If this report is true, any respect I had of the Democratic Party as an institution is now gone and the party should be disbanded.

    I did not vote for Dean or any other member of a political party organization to negotiate in my behalf. I can not vote a party leader in or out of office. If the Democratic Party is attempting to build some kind of a parallel government that rules by cronyism rather than being properly elected by and responsible to the people, then they need to be jailed.

    I have *never* seen a party stoop that low to avoid our electoral process. Just who the heck do they think they are?

  4. Carol_Herman says:

    Michigan elects arab lovers.

    But the real bleeding by 1000 cuts? Go to Drudge. It seems James Baker IS recommending the palestinians “get” their right of return. On top of Israel being forced back to her 1948 borders.

    Like the UN can’t produce more INEFFECTIVE #1701 paper. What are the europeans gonna do? Whose gonna “enforce” the edict?

    Let alone, John Bolton’s OUT of the UN. Rumsfeld is out of the DoD. But his “last minute thoughts as he exited DoD are now spread across the pages of the LA Times. And, are up on the Internet.

    In a world with cell phones. And, all our assorted voices.

    I give Baker, ultimately “fat chance.” To “no chance.”

    But Bush 2 did blow holes through many an allied relationship.

    Heck, Tony Blair plays “fatah” to Bush 2’s “hamas.” It’s not as if these two English speakers refer to each other in friendly terms.

    And, I wouldn’t overlook the friends Israel has. I’m sure Bush 2, nor Baker, ever considered they’d be facing an “iraqi study group” that’s gonna suffer Death By 1000 Cuts.

    Sure. Slow. And, painful. But a home run? A goal? I think what flies over the goal post first is a saudi promise to “defend” the sunni’s.

    ABOUT TIME! You got another way to cancel all that Saudi gold that bought every single mosque on the globe? And, turned them all into terrorist recruitment centers?

    Will Gates get confirmed? WHY NOT?

    Isn’t Litvenenko as dead as a doornail, because he “trusted” those that set him up?

    NO FINGERPRINTS! But if Tony Blair has no respect for Bush 2, how much “respect” dose the UK have for putin? Huh?

    Maybe, the best stuff on how things really, really, work, remains hidden?

    So. Gates gets confirmed. Anc, Cheney tosses in bed. Why stick around to be “investigated?” Why not wake up, and just call in sick?

    Given the conditions within the GOP, not only hasn’t Bush-2 considered “consequences.” What about the GOP Maverick? His name keeps showing up as a possible presidential nominee contendah? He’s gonna just hush up?

    Or have you see hats flying into the air?

    And, can’t you imagine that over the next six months there will be more stories gushing out, than if you stuck oil?

    Why is it that no one else questions where there are flaws in this oinment? It’s not a perfect solution, ya know.

  5. rodeoclown51528 says:

    B.E.A.utiful

  6. jerry says:

    Golly, I hope they don’t wind up bringing Hamas a cake shaped like a bible.

  7. jerry says:

    Actually, Gates might be just the guy for that.

  8. Barbara says:

    I keep thinking the dems can’t go any lower and they keep surprising me. The arrogance of the dem party knows no bounds. They are trying to usurp the president’s powers.

    Congress has no say in foreign policy and all these congressmen and senators who go to foreign countries on their stupid fact finding tours on our dime and without being sent by the president are traitors. They have all done this for decades on both sides of the aisle. No telling what harm the did to the president’s policy over the years. Politicians think they are above the law and are entitled to look at other countries and talk to their leaders on their own.

    No one will go to jail and probably not even be censured. Look at what Kerry did in 1971 and 72. He met with the enemy on his own cognizence and negotiated with them. He won a congressional seat and then senate seat based on his lies and traitorous activities.

    Isn’t it wonderful that we have the party of liars and traitors in charge of congress. They don’t let a silly thing like an election of a president stop them. They want power and they will seek and get it by hook or by crook. I despise them all, even the so-called moderate ones. They are tainted by association.

  9. For Enforcement says:

    I wonder if it happened. I certainly think it could have, but there is no evidence of it. Surely if they had their names they would have published them.

    And the answer to the question. The Pres and executive branch are responsible for conducting foreign policy. If someone else is interfering, it is a crime. But they have to be called for it. As Jon Carry wasn’t called for it in the 70’s, no one will be now.

  10. Enlightened says:

    Isn’t this close to sedition? Does it depend on whom in the Asshat Party they spoke with? I mean if they spoke with Al Gore or Jimmah Cahtah….well good luck.

    Any high flying Dems been out of the country lately?

  11. For Enforcement says:

    Any high flying Dems been out of the country lately?

    Hell, they probably met with them here in the US, maybe on capitol hill

  12. Enlightened says:

    Well, Sweetness and Light comments has another link to a Jewish site that qualifies the statement to: SENIOR MEMBERS of the Dumbass Party.

    So how come the DNC is so freakin quiet these days? Something smells Frisco-ish, and I’m not talking Jamil Hussein.

  13. Enlightened says:

    Possible sedition on US soil? Naw – can’t be.

  14. Carol_Herman says:

    Oh, Jerry. That’s funny! Who carried it? Ollie North?

    As to the flying rumors that the democrats hate Israel, it’s a lie.

    While Cheney, in Riyadh got read the riot act by the saudi fools! They told him, they wanted America to tell Israel to stop “going into gaza.”

    When, the real tragedy is playing out on a broader scale. Not just our troops USED! But inside Iraq. Where they were actually FIGHTING terorism. (Well? Like the jews!) And, they slammed the saudis up against the fence.

    Meanwhile? Who knows? James Baker certainly knows DC!

    But what if? What if the democrats IN THE MINORITY IN THIS OLD CONGRESS:; just went along with opportunities being presented by Baker? It’s not a love fest. And, the only donks Hamas talks to are the arab-lovers. NOT in the democratic majority! Get a life!

    Well, in January, Bush 2 goes to the well of the Congress. Does he just fling out the Iraqi Study Group’s “winning” Madrid #2 conference? Does he say he’s back on Bill Clinton’s arm wrestling with the terrorists, so they can get a state “called palestine?” And, Israel goes back to her 1948 borders? You really think Jews are gonna stick around to get scorched?

    Or the UN has ligitimacy? Because Condi says so? Wanna see what she can add to 1701? To round out a new score?

    What is it about the “incredibly shrinking party.” First, the name calling. RINO, yeah. And, then the threat that as soon as the GOP grew to 60 members in the senate “the conservatives would be bullet-proof.” Are the saudis bullet proof, too?

    While? Iraq has the second largest oil reserves in the world.

    And, an article up at Westhawk? Spoke of the Iranian’s running out of enough oil to even ship. In ten years. (Well, we don’t have ten years.)

    But mismanagement? You can also add Venezuela. And, Mexico. Where only 3% of the profits are plugged back into infrastructure. Well? Since when do despots plan for t’marra?

    While I think there’s enough HATRED within the arab communities, that, yes. Civil wars are more likely than not.

    And, Robert Gates? Senator Byrd asked him one of those “leading” questions. And, the anwer? American cannot do pre-emptive stuff to syria. Or iran. Hmm?

    Well, if you want to entice your enemy onto a battlefield where they’re weaker than you? How would you did this, now?

    I’m not so sure that the democrats are going to all climb on board “cut and run.” Maybe? Not even those who take their influences from the arabs. Some might get just as enraged at the Shi’a? They’re arabs, too.

    And, they’ve got dogs in this fight. Are they just dead dogs?

    James Baker has the “clout” of a Godfather that reaches how far out of his circle?

    Could it be Robert Gates is “in” … because it makes more things more difficult for Nixon. Oops. That’s another president, using the same team, that found himself hung out to dry. Or? Using his favorite expresion for others: Left to twist slowly in the wind.

    Even though the Belgians gear up their “world court” … and go after Israeli leadership to try the Jews “for crimes against humanity.” The only way the “do it” if they chuck legitimacy out da’ winda.

    Because? Israel has been defending herself against TERRORISTS.

    Ditto, Maliki! Ditto? Because the Saudis wanted to have the terrorism frightening the Shi’as. And, Kurds. Iraq’s not a one-horse town, anymore.

    And, its what happens ahead. IN THE LONG TERM. Are enough Americans disgusted, yet?

  15. dbostan says:

    CONGRATULATIONS to the Jews who voted demshevik!
    Nice job, fellows…

  16. topsecretk9@AJ says:

    CONGRATULATIONS to the Jews who voted demshevik!
    Nice job, fellows…

    WOW, leftist are just cool with their blatant and intolerant racism….it’s like Neo-Leftist HATE.
    Gross.

  17. crosspatch says:

    The more I live the more I sincerely believe that the left is populated with an abundance of people having serious psychological issues. Just have a look at how they treat each other sometimes on their own boards.

  18. topsecretk9@AJ says:

    I can’t find it on Drudge anymore, but

    If this report is true, any respect I had of the Democratic Party as an institution is now gone and the party should be disbanded.

    I completely agree – even – without this report.

  19. Carol_Herman says:

    Nope. Not true. But a HAMAS lie!

    Bunch of anti-Semites bite the Hamas bait all of the time!

    And, if you think James Baker isn’t an anti-Semite, ya know what? I don’t care.

    But Olmert, speaking to Israelis, very diplomatically, (per the Jerusalem Post), said he is well aware of James Baker’s opinions. Especially, the bit of “dialogue with syria.” And, he does not share them. Israel is NOT the cause of Bush #43’s problems in Iraq.

    And, even if it doesn’t change the way YOU vote; current events shows ya that the GOP is SHRINKING. You need voters to want to vote for you. But, go ahead. Calling people RINOs didn’t bring on enough losses.

    While Saddam’s gone? You bet this is a benefit to Iraqis. Who met the saudi funded SUNNI TERRORISTS, and upped them back. So half the Iraqi bad-guys; Baathists, and sunni supporters … Including palestinians, have upped at fled.

    Puting unbelievable pressures on the boy-king in Jordan.

    Sorry, folks, but there’s no sympathy for this crap coming from me.

  20. pagar says:

    Why is anyone surprised. John Kerry not only met with America’s
    enemies, adopted their positions and promoted them in the United
    States, but also got up in front of the Senate Committee on Foreign
    Relations on 22 Apr 1971 and told the world what he did. Knowing what he did, voters have sent him to Congress repeatedly. Knowing that the
    entire Vietnam conflict was corrupted by the actions of Jane Fonda, Walter Conkrite, John Kerry and numerous other, Congress still passed the Cooper-Church amendment insuring the destruction of a nation that had been promised protection by America. Doesn’t anyone wonder why
    any group opposed to America gets excited at the prospects of Democrats in power? Doesn’t anyone wonder how a major political party in the United States could nominate a person who had met with the enemy during time of war (supposedly as a private citizen) adopted and promoted the enemy points of view, to be president of the United States?