Mar 02 2009

Near Blizzard Conditions Cancel Global Warming Tirade By Debunked NASA ‘Scientist’

Published by at 10:05 am under All General Discussions,Global Warming

Jim Hansen, whose data has been found in error, whose models have never predicted any actual global temperatures for nearly 20 years, who denies the Earth is cooling (the real data), was to be out today in DC to call for civil disobedience if DC did not fatten his check book and make this man famous (he already is, as one of dumbest Chicken Littles to ever grace mankind). This modern day Oracle (well, people do like to play dress up) was supposed to rally the other Chicken Littles in DC today – except we’re taking a good pounding from a large snow storm which is bringing near blizzard like conditions to the area. Even the Feds shut down for half a day.

One thing is for sure, there will be no reputable Japanese scientists at the event  – since that country has broken with the mythical orthodoxy of Al Gore and declared Global Warming junk science:

Japanese scientists have made a dramatic break with the UN and Western-backed hypothesis of climate change in a new report from its Energy Commission. 

Three of the five researchers disagree with the UN’s IPCC view that recent warming is primarily the consequence of man-made industrial emissions of greenhouse gases. Remarkably, the subtle and nuanced language typical in such reports has been set aside.

One of the five contributors compares computer climate modelling to ancient astrology. Others castigate the paucity of the US ground temperature data set used to support the hypothesis, and declare that the unambiguous warming trend from the mid-part of the 20th Century has ceased.

The report by Japan Society of Energy and Resources (JSER) is astonishing rebuke to international pressure, and a vote of confidence in Japan’s native marine and astronomical research. Publicly-funded science in the West uniformly backs the hypothesis that industrial influence is primarily responsible for climate change, although fissures have appeared recently. Only one of the five top Japanese scientists commissioned here concurs with the man-made global warming hypothesis.

H/T Eric at Classical Values. The Japanese are laughing at the Global Warming doomsayers, because they have the scientific data the skeptics here have, which in turn proves these people have never once been right, and have ALWAYS been wrong on global climate. Only in the liberal media could science fiction be confused with science fact. It’s their poor education. They were never properly prepared to deal with the modern world. Yes, they make good money, but that is just an ego balm to cover up their real short comings.

Darwin was right you know.

Anyway, some more scientific responses from Japan on Uber Seer Jim Hansen’s mad ravings:

Kanya Kusano is Program Director and Group Leader for the Earth Simulator at the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science & Technology (JAMSTEC). He focuses on the immaturity of simulation work cited in support of the theory of anthropogenic climate change. Using undiplomatic language, Kusano compares them to ancient astrology. After listing many faults, and the IPCC’s own conclusion that natural causes of climate are poorly understood, Kusano concludes:

“[The IPCC’s] conclusion that from now on atmospheric temperatures are likely to show a continuous, monotonic increase, should be perceived as an unprovable hypothesis,” he writes.

Global mean temperature rose continuously from 1800-1850. The rate of increase was .05 degrees Celsius per 100 years. This was mostly unrelated to CO2 gas (CO2 began to increase suddenly after 1946. Until the sudden increase, the CO2 emissions rate had been almost unchanged for 100 years). However, since 2001, this increase halted. Despite this, CO2 emissions are still increasing.

According to the IPCC panel, global atmospheric temperatures should continue to rise, so it is very likely that the hypothesis that the majority of global warming can be ascribed to the Greenhouse Effect is mistaken. There is no prediction of this halt in global warming in IPCC simulations. The halt of the increase in temperature, and slight downward trend is “something greater than the Greenhouse Effect,” but it is in effect. What that “something” is, is natural variability.

From this author’s research into natural (CO2 emissions unrelated to human activity) climate change over the past 1000 years, it can be asserted that the global temperature increase up to today is primarily recovery from the “Little Ice Age” earth experienced from 1400 through 1800 (i.e. global warming rate of change=0.5℃/100).

The recovery in temperatures since follows a naturally variable 30-50 year cycle, (quasi-periodic variations), and in addition, this cycle has been positive since 1975, and peaked in the year 2000. This quasi-periodic cycle has passed its peak and has begun to turn negative.

It seems that global warming and the halting of the temperature rise are related to solar activity. Currently, the sun is “hibernating”. The end of Sunspot Cycle 23 is already two years late: the cycle should have started in 2007, yet in January 2008 only one sunspot appeared in the sun’s northern hemisphere, after that, they vanished completely (new sunspots have now begun to appear in the northern hemisphere). At the current time, it can clearly be seen there are no spots in the photosphere. Lately, solar winds are at their lowest levels in 50 years. Cycle 24 is overdue, and this is is worrisome.

So, have there been other historical periods with an absence of sunspots? As a matter of fact, from 1650 to 1700 approximately, there were almost no sunspots. This time period has been named for the renown English astronomer Maunder, and is called the Maunder Minimum.

There is a relationship between transported energy and the light emissions from the photosphere and sunspots.

The Maunder Minimum fell in the middle of the period of 1400-1800, the Little Ice Age, and it was theorized that this was due to a cut in solar emissions. The theory is that solar activity began to increase after that, and from 1800 global warming increased and recovery from the Little Ice Age began.

The only consensus is (a) there is no consensus because we don’t know enough yet to predict model the global climate, let alone predict it and (b) those who claim consensus are not real scientists.

3 responses so far

3 Responses to “Near Blizzard Conditions Cancel Global Warming Tirade By Debunked NASA ‘Scientist’”

  1. I R A Darth Aggie says:

    compares computer climate modelling to ancient astrology

    Oooooooh! That’s gonna leave a mark!

    (And yeah, it is an awful lot like reading entrails.)

  2. […] A.J Strata has some great information on how Japan is breaking away from the IPCC silliness, and what consensus really is. Sphere: Related Content If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds. Don’t forget to Blogroll Pirate’s Cove! addthis_pub = ‘wteach’; addthis_logo = ‘’; addthis_logo_background = ‘EFEFFF’; addthis_logo_color = ‘666699’; addthis_brand = ‘Pirate’s Cove’; addthis_options = ‘favorites, email, digg, delicious, fark, newsvine, technorati, facebook, google, live, more’; […]

  3. MarkN says:

    Your mention of Darwin in the post is most ironic. I’ll expand on that later.