Feb 21 2009

Liberal DC Democrats Have Ignited A Modern Revolution

Published by at 2:31 pm under All General Discussions

 

You can only cry “Wolf!” only so many times before people reject you because you lost all credibility with them. The liberal Democrats now in charge in DC have royally screwed up, and in record time. Their blindness to what they were doing, and how it could fail spectacularly, is a testament to their toxic combination of arrogance and ignorance. They actually do believe they are God’s chosen and the masses are too stupid to understand their simple minded PR!

Let’s begin with someone on the left who clearly has seen the warning signs, and what appears to now be coming:

As more Americans lose their jobs and their homes, as more businesses crater and banks topple, popular anger is rising like a wall of water over a suddenly quiet beachfront resort. You’d think that the Democrats in Washington would be aware of the danger. After all, the massive expansion of Great Society spending in the 1960s, followed by the stagflation of the 1970s, allowed the marginal conservative movement to tap populist anger and dominate American politics for a generation. Substitute stimulus for Great Society and years of possible “stag-deflation” for stagflation, and you have a scenario in which the Obama’s overwhelming majority could collapse as quickly as LBJ’s.

To date, however, the Obama administration has seemed more concerned with reassuring Wall Street that it will be protected against Main Street hotheads than in disciplining Wall Street on behalf of Main Street Americans who have lost jobs, homes, and savings.

Geithner himself is a lightning rod for populist wrath. Ordinary Americans who fail to pay their taxes can expect strict punishment. When Geithner forgot to pay sizeable sums, he was quickly forgiven and made Treasury secretary. Most Americans cannot afford maids, legal or illegal.

For a generation, the white-collar liberals who now dominate the Democratic Party have shown a remarkable ability to dress up their own economic interests in the rhetoric of globalization and anti-racism while attacking the motives and assaulting the characters of Americans who are far less wealthy and privileged. They conveniently forget to pay taxes for their illegal-immigrant maids and nannies, and then they denounce fellow citizens who can’t afford servants as Nazi-like xenophobes for insisting that all immigrants, not just some, obey federal immigration laws. They use their status as alumni of elite universities to get their mediocre children admitted by means of legacy programs (class-based affirmative action), and then they blame racism when working-class and middle-class whites criticize race-based affirmative action. They benefit from a regulated national labor market that effectively restricts the number of lawyers, MBAs and teachers allowed to practice in the US, and then they altruistically offer to sacrifice the livelihoods of American factory workers to help out the Chinese poor and to put American farms out of business to help the African poor. They claim that by living in expensive doorman buildings in fashionable downtowns and using uneconomical, taxpayer-subsidized mass transit they are saving the planet from global warming, and then they criticize working-class Americans with a fraction of their incomes who can only afford to live in exurbs and shop at Sam’s Club as sprawl-creating slobs. 

The majority of Americans, even during the conservative years, were never against big government; they were against big government that provides special treatment whether to minorities, illegal immigrants, or the CEOs and shareholders of Wall Street firms that are too big to fail. What wrecked the Democratic Party was the public’s perception of double standards.

Amazingly, some prominent Democrats have yet to figure this out.

Harshly accurate. Strange how some people remain stubbornly clueless. Now combine this snobby self interest of the wealthy and well connected liberal elites (which used to be the face of the rich snobby conservatives) and combine that with a series of disastrous mistakes and the stage is set for what is to come.

The Feds cried “crisis” last fall, when Bush, Dems and Reps all passed the huge TARP bill – bankrupting our future for at least a decade. The promise was this would fix the economy.

Then Obama takes office and starts crying “crisis” again, handing over the reigns of the stimulus bill details to the pork addicted Congress. Obama cried “Crisis!” so many times you can now listen to a long clip of him using the word to get the stimulus bill passed on Hannity’s radio show. The second bill passed, but this time without the GOP (there were more Dems against it than Reps for it). This put the nation into debt for maybe a quarter of a century – and again the bill promised to fix the economy.

Then not even one week went by before the fools in DC cried “crisis” again – this time with the banks which everyone thought were fixed under last fall’s TARP. It has become clear the liberals in DC have no idea what to do, except keep crying “crisis”. They are not fixing the economy as promised, and they have bankrupted us for decades

And it gets worse, if that were even possible: there will be NO new jobs from the spendulous bill for at least a year. Since the bill is a spending bill and not a stimulus bill it will take the cumbersome federal government months (if not years) to just start the new projects. The proposal process alone will take 6-9 months, and then you have to plan, review plans, get the proper paperwork filled out, review designs, etc. 

All this time between now and 2010 there will be no fix to the job market – which will simmer the American people like applying a torch to a can of gas. Instead of jobs the bill does provide 5-10 stories a day for the next year on idiotic ideas on how to waste our money. As people scrape to survive they will be reminded of the daily list of wasteful projects from around the country. Each project in itself enough to take a well deserved family from desperation to riches in one fell swoop. The bill is massive, it has endless wasteful spending to mine and to remind those people without relief what foolishness is being funded.

And so the talk around the nation’s dinner tables will be pondering question like why dogs in CA are getting an area to run and defecate for a price tag that could send all my kids through college? Which is a better national investment: my kids or some pooping puppies in Pasadena?

President Obama is rapidly morphing into President O’Blunder, with good reason. People are starting to notice he has no idea what he is doing and has basically lost control. Tony Blankley was one of those who made this observation recently. Tony goes through the now classic litany of Obama screw ups from the tax cheating cabinet to the stimulus disaster. But what is important to note is his conclusions on what this means in terms of Obama’s governing skills:

Whatever the reason, this level of presidential detachment from high policy decision making is dangerous in a White House that has so many czars and other senior players (the West Wing staff is reputed to be more than 130 — about double the usual number) combined with emissaries and strong-willed Cabinet secretaries. It may well lead to what has been called (regarding another country’s government) “the immanent structurelessness to the running of the state.”

We can see evidence of this already. The Transportation Secretary floated the Big Brother idea of taxing Americans by the mile, relying on GPS to track a car’s every move to calculate the taxes owed. This ludicrous idea would penalize everyone who goes with fuel efficient cars by treating them equally – tax wise – to gas guzzlers. The fact is by taxing the fuel you are taxing the miles traveled, without the surveillance required. Talk about your simpletons!

Another example of his losing control of the message are his recent attempts to stop the financial blood letting on rumors of nationalizing the banks. It has gotten so bad President Clinton had to come out and push for more “Hope” in all this change, while Obama tries to stop the rumors flying from loose lips around DC.

Karl Rove also recently noted the emerging image of President Obama as more inept than inspirational:

Nevertheless, this fast start can’t overcome a growing sense the administration is winging it on issues large and small.

Team Obama was winging it when it declared the stimulus would “save or create” 2.5 million, then three million, then 3.7 million, and then four million new jobs. These were arbitrary and erratic numbers, and they knew there’s no way to count “saved” jobs. Americans, being commonsensical, will focus on Mr. Obama’s promise to “create” jobs. It’s highly unlikely that more than 180,000 jobs will be created each month by the end of next year. The precise, state-by-state job numbers the administration used to sell the stimulus are likely to come back to haunt them as well.

And that is the bottom line – all we have to do is watch the job numbers. Obama wants us to watch the spending numbers, but that is not sufficient. State by state stimulus spending tracked against state by state unemployment will be the test. And since these numbers are publicly available from the government it will be hard to blame others for the Democrats pending failures.  They cannot avoid the measurements, and the coming months of failure to produce jobs while the money flows.

The most glaring example of Team Obama being in over their head and not ready for prime time was Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner’s disastrous bail out plan roll out. It was so glaring it had to be reported as the blunder of colossal magnitude it was – and it was all about not being prepared:

Just days before Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner was scheduled to lay out his much-anticipated plan to deal with the toxic assets imperiling the financial system, he and his team made a sudden about-face.

According to several sources involved in the deliberations, Geithner had come to the conclusion that the strategies he and his team had spent weeks working on were too expensive, too complex and too risky for taxpayers.

They needed an alternative and found it in a previously considered initiative to pair private investments and public loans to try to buy the risky assets and take them off the books of banks. There was one problem: They didn’t have enough time to work out many details or consult with others before the plan was supposed to be unveiled.

The Obama administration, they said, failed to rein in the grand expectations built for the plan on Wall Street and in Washington, concluding that they would rather disappoint the markets with vagueness than lay out a lot of details they might have to change later

Moreover, the department made a strategic decision to limit input from the financial industry and other outsiders, aiming to prevent leaks and avoid a perception they were designing the plan for the benefit of big banks. But that also meant they were unable to vet their plan with the companies involved or set realistic expectations of what would be announced.

Klutzes – plain and simple. The new media rumor mill of playing to back-room deals and stereo-types is no excuse to blow this window of opportunity. This is why the Bush administration discussed energy policy with leaders in the field before offering their plans, and stood by their guns when challenged on the impropriety of vetting national polices with key groups. Boy, do the media look stupid or what? Not only did they misreport on Bush, they pushed Obama into another O’Blunder.

Another bad sign: the Markets have been grading the Democrats through out all of this, and so far they are failing miserably. Every time they open their mouths America grows poorer.

And what about US Attorney General Holder coming out and insulting America and calling us all cowards? Them fighting words. It is one thing to screw up. It can be a crime to take other people’s money and screw up. But to take our money, screw up using it and insult us  – it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see where this is headed.

This week something awoke in the nation and is starting to spread. The ignition spark seems to have been a commentary on CNBC this week by Rick Santelli, who called for a second Boston Tea Party. The original tea party sparked the revolution against the oppressive British rulers who simply saw America as a source of personal wealth and not a people full of pride and spirit. The similarities to today and the liberal elites in DC is clearly disturbing.

This is spark is igniting the fuel of frustration that has been simmering with all the false promises, corrupt cronyism and ineptitude – all while bankrupting hard working, responsible Americans. There is now talk of tea parties in every city and town in the nation. If done right, there could be a massive, grass roots event coordinated across America here very soon, and without a lot of effort. People are ready to end this nonsense.

Some have asked would I rather see me lose equity or bail out those who abused the system (to save the system). I would rather lose the equity, because (1) it’s already lost and (2) I still need to pay my mortgage and I cannot afford someone else’s debt. So no, don’t bail out the failures. Worst case is I lose equity. If I have to bail out people I still lose the equity but also go further into debt against my will. I think this is what Santelli has tapped into, this feeling that for those of us working and paying our way, we are done bailing out.

This is not to say the GOP is going to gain a windfall from this. They don’t deserve it and we don’t need to keep trading one fringe group for another. This time the revolution will be broad (and bloodless). The American center is fed up with the screw ups from the hyper partisans, who demand purity over progress, therefore producing failure over progress.

The non-aligned center is going to rise up and not only throw the bums out, they are going to throw the dysfunctional parties out as well. America has the power of the internet to spread the word to millions at minimal cost (opposed to national TV ad costs). All that is required is for this rising wave of rejection to coalesce around a new direction, new ideas. Once this takes hold the real change will finally begin to happen.

And let me see if I can give the new movement a little boost with some proposals of my own. Just a few today, more in the coming days. I will see if LJStrata has time to give me a panel on the site to list the proposals and get comments.

Here is one element of MY stimulus package proposal: Young Workers Tax Exemption

I propose workers under 18 years of age be exempt from income and social security taxes. These are people just entering the job world, typically living with their parents who are paying taxes for the family. These jobs can have no benefits and are seasonal or temporary. There is no need to tax the next generation at this early stage. Given the debt we are handing them they deserve a bit of a break as they begin their transition into the work force.

I would not exempt the employers from the social security taxes, etc. I don’t want to give them a financial incentive to cycle through a lot of underage workers to save a few bucks on the bottom line. Being a businessman I can understand there are times you do what you must or can to keep the business alive. This break is for the kids, not businesses.

I would extend this tax exemption through four years of college (maybe with a cap at the age of 25 or so). This would provide a further incentive to get a college education, and give those folks investing in their future a break, since we as a nation will reap the financial rewards of their efforts by taxing them their entire remaining lifetime.

This is a great way to push money into the economy (young people spend like bandits), while providing incentives for young people to work and get a good education. No wonder the special interest geniuses in DC can’t think this one up – makes too much sense.

Proposal two: Everyone Chips In

Everyone needs to pay some federal income tax – even if it a small amount at first. I propose everyone pay at least $2 dollars a week. This would be the lowest tax bracket – a minimal rate (as a percentage of some income or poverty level). After this the normal income tax brackets would kick in. We are all in this together, everyone should chip in something. It’s not a lot and probably should be a bit more, but it is imperative that everyone chips in.

Welcome to the revolution!

Update: Well, if Obama wants to stimulate the economy maybe he should pay the nearly $2 million he owes Chicago as well as the other bills his campaign dodged out on.

Update: Others note the bubbling caldera of populism beginning to break through.

Update: Obama is crazy to make promises he can’t keep. Check out this week’s radio announcement:

“Earlier this week, I signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act – the most sweeping economic recovery plan in history. Because of this plan, three and a half million Americans will now go to work doing the work that America needs done.

Is he serious? Mark my words – no fix to the job market for a year.

Because of what we did together, there will now be shovels in the ground, cranes in the air, and workers rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, and repairing our faulty levees and dams. 

Shovels in the ground? Dude, what kind of job is that! This thing reads like a B-Movie script. Is he kidding?

28 responses so far

28 Responses to “Liberal DC Democrats Have Ignited A Modern Revolution”

  1. djl130 says:

    AJ – This is such a great post. I am so fumed. The Santelli video struck such a chord with me. You know – it is not as if people who can’t afford a mortgage can’t find a place to live!!! I don’t get it. They can rent a u-haul and pack their stuff up and RENT. There’s no shame in it!!! I was dubious about the first TARP thing. But I was swept up in the “We must save the banks!!!” garbage. Now, I am over all this spending. I am sick about the amount of money. Nauseous. After hearing the commercial equating it to a million dollars a day (A DAY!!!!) since Christ was born, I want to vomit. Thanks for taking the time to post this information. Where can I revolt?Sign me up.

  2. […] The Strata-Sphere wrote an interesting post today on Liberal DC Democrats Have Ignited A Modern RevolutionHere’s a quick excerpt  You can only cry “Wolf!” only so many times before people reject you because you lost all credibility with them. The liberal Democrats now in charge in DC have royally screwed up, and in record time. Their blindness to what they were doing, and how it could fail spectacularly, is a testament to their toxic combination of arrogance and ignorance. They actually do believe they are God’s chosen and the masses are too stupid to understand their simple minded PR! Let’s begin with someone on the […]

  3. Terrye says:

    AJ:

    I agree with a lot of what you say, but in all fairness when Bush agreed to do TARP 1 back in September he never said it would fix everything. Just the opposite. He said it was necessary to put liquidity into the financial markets so that they did not freeze up.

    But what Obama has done is to use the situation to spend hundred of billions more than Bush ever thought about spending, for all kinds of things that Bush did not ever support. We have the Obama administration messing with health care, over turning welfare reform and increasing spending for pork barrel projects that have nothing to do with jobs or credit.

    Bush was downright frugal compared to these people.

  4. Terrye says:

    djl:

    I think the first TARP was probably necessary. But I also think that there are people who will take advantage of a crisis to do things they would not otherwise be able to do.

  5. CatoRenasci says:

    Pitchforks!

    Tar!

    Feathers!

    Rails!

    It wouldn’t surprise me if the actual crisis last Fall turned out to have been triggered by Soros manipulating the currency markets (there was a Congressman (D) on C-Span who talked about a 500 Billion run on the dollar in just a couple of hours in September – which he said is what triggered Paulson going to Bush with the “TARP or lose the banks” ultimatum). Don’t forget the bank Schumer killed with his letter, and similar idiocy. The financial crisis was the October surprise!

    The markets have been voting “no” on the Democrats ever since early May 2008, when it became clear Obama would be the nominee. The August-September pause was when it looked like McLame had a chance to win.

  6. Neo says:

    Bottomline:
    The “New Era of Responsibility” has been reduced to a button that you can put next to your Gerry Ford “Whip Inflation Now” button that was equally useless.

  7. kathie says:

    Well done AJ, happy you’re back!

    Some thoughts……
    The first $700 billion that went to the banks was a loan, and should be paid back in exchange for shares bought. I think the reason for the buy was described on C-SPAN by a guy on the banking committee. He described a day in Sept. I think, that the banking system was in total melt-down, money being drawn down by the billions and nobody to stop it or knew why. I think they finally stopped it at $500 billion. Nobody was allowed to talk about it because they still don’t know what happened. Lehman Brothers went down before they could catch it. Paul Volker said he had never seen anything like the speed and breath of the collapse that spread through out the world. So the first bailout was to stop a world wide melt-down in the banking system.

    Rham Emmanuel stated once that Obama should not let a crisis go to waste. Obama stated from the beginning, remember “Joe the Plumber” that we need a system that is more fair and will raise the bottom up. Also remember, minorities should be hired to do the jobs, not the white guys, Robert Raisch (sp). This is what the $786 billion is all about in the guise of a stimulus, now the title is the “recovery” something, not a stimulus. Obama invited all his community organizing guys to the White House for dinner last night and gave out talking points to go out into the communities and talk up the “recovery act”. Who are his community guys, oh, Moveon.org, George Soros sponsored crowd, ACORN, and the rest.

    Santelli was just so good. By chance I saw it live. It was really something, the programmers didn’t know if they should cut him off or let him go. It was a mutiny on the air waves. His message was really that the government is now punishing the individual for hard work.

    To look like everything that is not Bush, Tim Geithner’s little presser certainly took the cake. Never would Bush send out a top guy so unprepared, so highly recommended, with so much power and so little to say. It certainly was un-Bush.

    I would have expected more from Holder, given the bruising conformation. You would think he would stay away from controversy after the Rich pardon and the terrorist pardon. But oh no. The only civil conversation I’ve seen lately about race is whitey is bad, we must pay. OK, now that conversation is over, I would rather talk about the content of character, and ideas, is that possible………I’m thinking probably not.

    So the stock market is tanking. Gosh, how much money are the states and the Feds going to loose in taxes. Yet our congress is flying all over the world to talk to the Pope, with their families. Or going to Gaza and talking to Hamas, while the CEO’S are selling their planes on EBay. How is the private plane market doing? Obama is not interested in individual wealth as if all investors are wealthy. Maybe he will find out the value of personal wealth and corporate wealth when the US Treasury is empty.

    So now with $270 billion, home mortgages are going to be refinanced. With the banks and tax payers paying the difference. How is that going to work. Force banks to lend to a troubled home owner to borrow again. Refinanced homes have already defaulted 65%. My home is not the same value that it was when I bought it 26 years ago. I’m sure it’s value has fluctuated up and down over the years. If given enough time homes gain in value. If seen as an investment, the largest made in a life time, over a life time a home will gain in value. A home is not a big Mac.

    Obama is not Bush ideological, he is progressive ideological. He is absolutely predictable. He will give away until there is nothing left to give.

    Remember folks, we still have the 2009 budget to pass. I have read Nancy and friends have already written it. All the shit has yet to hit the fan. It is going to be bad. I’m wondering, when is Obama going to go line by line and cut every program that is wasteful spending out of the budget? Maybe after it is passed.

  8. kathie says:

    This is interesting, found at “Freerepublic”

    Official: Obama wants to halve budget deficit
    02/21/2009 1:33:51 PM PST · by Free ThinkerNY · 22 replies · 278+ views
    Associated Press ^ | Feb. 20, 2009 | LIZ SIDOTI
    WASHINGTON (AP) – President Barack Obama wants to cut the federal deficit in half by the end of his first term. He would try to achieve that mostly by scaling back Iraq war spending, raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans and making government run more efficiently.

  9. Terrye says:

    kathie:

    I heard that they feared the drop would be in excess of a trillion in a day. That would have been the end. I mean, banks would have folded all over the world.

    I wondered if someone found a way to trigger some kind of computer program that would make withdrawals in a matter of minutes or something. It is hard to believe that it was just accidental. Either it was deliberate, or it was some kind of panic.

  10. Terrye says:

    As for Iraq war spending, a lot of those costs are fixed parts of the military. Those soldiers will get paid no matter where they are. I do think that the costs of the war will go down no matter who is president in the next few years.

  11. lurker9876 says:

    As for the Iraqi war spending, it’s small part of 4 percent of the GDP so I just don’t see how this will help pay off the deficit.

    Obie should have done a line by line verification of the stimulus plan. Since he claims that the stimulus plan had no pork and earmarks, then he won’t be successful in cutting back program waste.

  12. kathie says:

    Terrye, I guess what I’m saying about the first $700 billion that it is characterized as a Bush give away to the banks so now where are the give aways to the people……..as I heard it, it was not exactly a give away like Obama’s give aways. Nobody is talking about what happened because they don’t know, or they don’t want it to happen again. It is a crying shame that the record will not be set straight. Of course the banking committee knows what happened, but will spin it to what ever advantage they can. My first thought was George Soros, then China, but who knows, for sure it was really bad and if not stopped all the banks and bankers of any description, would have been shut down. Then world wide stock markets and it would have snowballed from there. It would have made 911 look like a blimp on the screen.

  13. Frogg says:

    Count me in as part of the Santelli Revolution. I’m just waiting for my marching orders.

    And, another thing…..

    I’ve heard three Dems in the Obama Admin bash Bush or try to lay blame on Bush for things this past week. This isn’t going to fly either.

  14. lurker9876 says:

    Count me as part of these revolutions.

    When the Bush tax cuts expire, what happens to the Schedule D standard deductions?

    As for the Bush tax cuts, where were the pre-Bush tax rates and the Bush tax rates?

  15. Frogg says:

    16 percent of those voting for Obama in the general election wish there were more Republicans in Congress.
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,496545,00.html

  16. Frogg says:

    Wednesday, February 11, 2009

    Democrats are still trusted more than Republicans to handle the economy by a 44% to 39% margin, but their advantage on the issue has been slipping steadily since November.

    Thirty-nine percent (39%) of voters trust the GOP more when it comes to immigration, while 37% trust the Democrats more. A month ago, the Democrats led by seven on this issue.

    Democrats continue to hold big advantages on the issues of health care, social security and education.

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues/trust_on_issues

  17. lurker9876 says:

    Wonder if those poll numbers have shifted since 2/11?

  18. […] Well, here’s a story on her multiple defaults from last summer. Plus, some thoughts on double standards. […]

  19. Mike M. says:

    AJ, you haven’t touched half of it. The other shoe is likely to be foreign policy. Either an Iranian atomic bomb test or a major terrorist attack.

    The overall situation is reminiscent of France in 1788…a near-bankrupt government, a ruling class completely lacking in interests with the common man, wholesale corruption, and botched foreign policy.

    A year later, the Bastille fell…and the guilliotine was erected.

    This could get very ugly.

  20. […] AJ talks of simmering frustration nationwide, bubbling to the surface. President Obama is rapidly morphing into President O’Blunder, with good reason. People are starting to notice he has no idea what he is doing and has basically lost control. Tony Blankley was one of those who made this observation recently. Tony goes through the now classic litany of Obama screw ups from the tax cheating cabinet to the stimulus disaster. But what is important to note is his conclusions on what this means in terms of Obama’s governing skills: Whatever the reason, this level of presidential detachment from high policy decision making is dangerous in a White House that has so many czars and other senior players (the West Wing staff is reputed to be more than 130 — about double the usual number) combined with emissaries and strong-willed Cabinet secretaries. It may well lead to what has been called (regarding another country’s government) “the immanent structurelessness to the running of the state.” […]