Oct 06 2008

How Many Terrorists Does Obama Have Dinner With?

What kind of mindset does it take to have many, many dinners and discussions with an agent of the PLO, and then think it will not be brought up during an election for President? Obama and his media puppets are really playing the end game in this election poorly. His connections to American Terrorist Bomber William Ayers is bad enough, but now we learned he lied to America about his connections to Rashid Khalidi, a former PLO operative.

Watch the following Sean Hannity video (probably at least twice) and notice how Obama claims the closest he comes to Khalidi is the fact their kids went to the same school, yet note a much earlier Obama who gives a lavish farewell party to Rashidi and reminisces about many, many dinners shared and discussions had. Obama has just been caught lying about his connections to a PLO employee – now that is going to be an interesting debate topic!


H/T Gateway Pundit.

Apparently the LA Times has a copy of the video were Obama praised Khalidi, but refuses to release it! America deserves to know Obama’s relationship with Khalidi, especially since he has given seriously conflicting stories about it. If the LA Times has information that is Obama’s own words on the matter, they cannot hold that back from the voters.  To do so would violate their responsibility as a member of the 4th estate. Are they journalists or propagandists? Are they Americans or followers of Joseph Goebbels, the renowned Nazi propaganda chief? They have this one moment in history to select their path.

5 responses so far

5 Responses to “How Many Terrorists Does Obama Have Dinner With?”

  1. Mike M. says:

    Choose? The propaganda press made THAT choice forty years ago, maybe more.

    They stand against America, not for it.

  2. owl says:

    Great title to this post.

    I just want to point out another effective visual for this. One tiny segment when the reporter was walking down Obama’s street. That should be an ad. She knocks on Ayers’ door and then says that Farrakhan lives down the street.

    He is knee deep. So why does the public not care? Why do they not believe their eyes? Now we must accept terrorists. They do not even bother to disguise their lies. Biden debate is proof. They are not required because they write and produce their dramas. The proof was Plame.

    Someone wrote that they would not hold the Oversight Soaps because they would not dare. HA! Remember the witnesses of Plame? They hitting McCain with Keating on GMA. Whoever advises McCain should have had him in front of cameras as soon as Bush’s ink was dry. With all the money spent in campaigns, could they not just pay one Joe Six Pack to do the watching? Just one.

  3. Aitch748 says:

    Not only have the media made their choice, but I keep wondering if the media will make a decision to simply stop covering McCain/Palin at all a week before the election, should they realize that covering things that Governor Palin have said are hurting their candidate.

    On the other hand, I don’t suppose it does us any good dwelling on such things, except to remind us that our opponent is the media and that we need to be ready for anything, including stuff that would be preposterous if the media were unbiased.

  4. […] those wondering why McCain-Palin is bringing up Ayers (and others) now it is to hammer Obama with his deceptions and terrible past associations in the final lap of […]

  5. […] William Ayers explain to all of us why it was OK for them to try and kill us. Why not add in Professor Rashid Khalidi from the PLO as […]