Sep 10 2007
The Liberal Plan To Lose The War In Iraq
Liberals are so obsessed with surrendering Iraq to al-Qaeda they even hold strategy meetings on how to make this disaster come about – without looking like they are trying to make it come about! For people to digest – an insight into the minds of dedicated defeatists:
Congresswoman Lynne Woolsey: Let’s start with what it’s going to take. It’s going to take some courage to not fund continuing the occupation. But we have to make sure that ending the war is not perceived as abandoning the troops. So what the triad (Congresswomen Woolsey, Waters, and Lee), are proposing ( H.R. 508 by Barbara Lee) is that we only fund a safe and orderly redeployment, including bringing the big equipment out of Iraq.
Defeat at all costs, but under the cover of lies and half truths – H/T Politico
Lynn Woolsey also wants to terminate all training support for the Iraqi security forces.
If America were to ever adopt my tongue-in-cheek proposal to deport the stupid, Marin County would be depopulated almost immediately.
We won the war. Bush lost the occupation due to total lack of planning. Neocons continue to blindly support him, however, because of the way the conservative brain functions – conservatives have a hard time dealing with ambiguity and complexity:
BREAKING NEWS: 99% of all “liberals”, due to their complex brain circuitry, are TRAITORS!
Case closed, thanks for cluing us in “Bootlicker”.
Pretty pathetic showing, Dale.
liberals were 4.9 times more likely than conservatives to show activity in the brain circuits that deal with conflicts
Utterly unsurprising, in that the intellectual onanism that passes for “liberalism” these days is riven with both ice-cream-headache-inducing internal contradictions (it takes years of ingesting really bad drugs in copious quantities to simultaneously support abortion and oppose the death penalty) and contradictions with the external world (believe it or not, co-signing a piece of paper with a thug who happens to be a head of state will not guarantee “peace in our time,” no matter how vigorously you wave it during a photo-op).
Sooth:
Semantics. Once upon a time a liberal like John F. Kennedy said we would pay any price and bear any burden to advance the cause of liberty. Now profascists using the guise of liberalism pander to dictators and mass murderers and have neither respect for or loyalty to liberty.
If they have their way this time no one will ever take our word for anything again.
Terrye –
Considering your limited circuitry I compliment you on the rudimentary sentences you are able to form.
Cobaltshiva – not so much. Back to remedial English for you.
Cobaltshiva – not so much. Back to remedial English for you.
Nice try. Go away before I tell your mother that you’re abusing her AOL account.
Sooth,
Sounds like real science. LOL
Macker-
Not that you’d recognize “science” if it bit your wide behind, but this study conducted by scinetists at New York University and the University of California, Los Angeles, has been published in the perr-reviewed journal Nature Neuroscience (http://www.nature.com/neuro/index.html).
Like most conservatives, you only recognize science that agrees with your own limited preconceptions. It explains why belief in fairy tales like creationism or intelligent design is ONLY found in conservatives.
Sooth,
FYI: My MS from UC Berkeley ought to indicate some familiarity with science.
In crawling up the food chain, why did you stop at the liberal stage? I guess natural selection doesn’t favor leftists.
“Liberals want to lose in Iraq?’ I don’t understand what we can possibly “win.’ It’s a pipe dream to think we can reverse the course of a civilization several thousand years old that cares nothing about human life. We have no business there.
The only thing I want to lose is this wrong-headed foreign policy and
the administration that goes with it.