May 16 2007
Political Hack Smears Co-workers
Updated!
When the liberal media has to shore up the reputation of the political hacks in DC trying to pretend to be simple, innocent civil servant (trust me, in DC everyone is out for their personal agenda and fame) you KNOW the media’s propaganda dance for the Dems is on:
JAMES B. COMEY, the straight-as-an-arrow former No. 2 official at the Justice Department, yesterday offered the Senate Judiciary Committee an account of Bush administration lawlessness so shocking it would have been unbelievable coming from a less reputable source.
Actually, it is well known in town (Clarice will have all the dope out) that Comey is politically connected. And when something stretched like this, it is. The flip side of the WaPo observation is it is hard to believe someone like Comey would lower themselves to smearing others for personal gain. But DC is a notorious place where people battle ferociously for top positions and will do pretty much whatever it takes to cash in. So I seriously doubt the WaPo has discovered a rare diamond in the ruff. They are just propping up another Joe Wilson-class fibber.
Addendum: I guess it needs to be also noted that the PURPOSE of the visit to Ashcroft was the fear a terrorist attack may have been in the offing and there was a need for surveillance to protect America. It seems stating the obvious is now required for the BDS driven media who have become so consumed by their Bush hatred they have forgotten 9-11 even happened. Let alone there are people out there right now trying to exceed 9-11 in any manner they can concoct. So getting a surveillance warrant was a case of national security. I guess Comey forgot to mention that minor little detail. And it is clear Comey was a Gorelickite – one who was so afraid of what Americans might do with warrants he was willing to let terrorists free reign in our borders. Just as we did with 9-11. Reporters NEVER affirm the well known fact that many officials are on the record with statements that indicate NSA HAD leads on the 9-11 highjackers, but the old PROCESS (not law) required them to throw them out because one end of the intercept was in the US. Yes folks, we had the leads but the process Comey tried to salvage, and which led to 9-11 not being stopped, got in the way. That is the kind of man Comey is.
Addendum: Since RCP is now linking to this post as a right vs left (Firedoglake vs AJStrata) let me recap all my points on why the NSA program was NEVER illegal. I have a whole category of posts on the subject, but a sampling of one or two will suffice to show that reporting from the NY Times and Washington Post, covering public statements made by FISA Court Judges and government officials, make clear the NSA did nothing different or illegal. The main point is to go back to the NY Times initial story and note that the story was all wrong. It claimed the Bush administration bypassed the FIS Court, when in fact just the opposite was true. Prior to 9-11 (and based on Congressional Records from the Church Commission in the late 1970’s – at the time the FISA law was created) the NSA has always monitored our enemies’ communications. This should be of no surprise since that is their mission.
What was standard practice was to toss out all communications intercepted that had one end of the communication in the US. It was deemed a fail safe way to avoid the issue of using intel in law enforcement cases. This mindset solidified over the years as layers of policies (not laws) encoded this myopic practice. What this meant is we had surveillance of communications between the 9-11 highjackers and their masters overseas leading up to 9-11. These communications where never passed onto the FBI or local law enforcement.
The NY Times story was built around the resignation of a FISA Judge whose statement was the NSA leads “tainted” the FIS Court. Tainting is synonymous with ‘polluted’ which meant the NSA leads after 9-11 where actually going to the court – not bypassing it. There are numerous accounts of the FBI getting swamped with these new leads as Bush tore down the Gorelick wall which was the last incarnation of the blind mindset of ignoring potential terrorists here in country to save the messy details of court cases. Lawyers do love to minimize their headaches.
So what happened was post 9-11 was the NSA leads were now being passed to the FIS Court as the basis for probable cause in obtaining warrants. Until then it required FBI investigations to obtain independent evidence before warrants would be issued. The NSA leads were passed to the chief FIS Court judge for review into warrant applications. No other justices knew of this arrangement – which eventually leaked out and caused the one judge to resign and run to the media (with some Dem Congressional support).
The fact is the NSA was now following a process to vet leads, pass them to the FBI which could obtain temporary surveillance warrants so they could ascertain the threat level faster. This is clearly indicated in the final procedures adopted by the FIS Court which codified this new LEGAL process. Again, it is process issue – not a legal one. What the left cannot admit or face is the fact we need to act on intel to protect Americans. There were plenty of defenders of the old, suicidal process. Their lunatic theory was that protecting Americans took second priority to protecting laws. This is not the Constitutional mandate we have. Government is to protect the life, liberty and happiness of the people here, not some legal process. This is also evident by the FACT that the FIS Court first attempted to re-instate the Gorelick wall and even claimed this was their purpose in life in the one case which was appealed to the FIS Review Court (the court the resides over the FIS Court). The FIS Court lost and the NSA program proceeded. This was the only time in history the FIS Review Court was ever empanelled.
As I said I have nearly 200 posts on the subject and all my findings are traceable to the public record. I offer two (here and here) as just a sampling of what is out there if one looks. The NSA surveillance program corrected an idiotic policy that allowed 9-11 to happen. It is now corrected and virtually no warrants are being rejected. Also, the FIS Court has taken the lead in codifying the program. The NSA never changed one thing it did. All that happened is the leads it uncovered that led back to America or Americans (overseas) were now free to be passed to law enforcement, who investigate them and apply for FIS Court warrants for action. Those who claim otherwise are just ignorant of the facts surrounding this critical issue. And that includes all of the news media. H/T to RCP for the link!
Addendum: I have to respond to my great Ed Morrissey on this issue. While the DoJ report he references may have found some nits, the point is the program was solid and should NOT have been held up just because Comey did a CYA move. My guess (and Comey can confirm as well as the DoJ report) is the results of the analysis were minor adjustments and DID NOT affect on going investigations. With a 60 day turn around the policy adjustments called out in the review could have been done with the program continuing AND any specific cases effected suspended. The Feds are a slow moving group of people who have no desire to take responsibility. Thus Comey’s hesitation was all CYA (cover his butt). It is very clear Bush determined (a) none of the current cases were time critical and (b) the adjustments could be made in time to avoid risk. Comey can attest to these facts NOW. He will dodge these points. Trust me. He is a career CYA artist. There is nothing here and Comey was playing games. Any specific case affected by the DoJ review could have been suspended if necessary. A full up denial was not required. Any issues could have been handled by memos outlining new guidance for warrant applications. The bottom line was Comey did not need to put us all at risk at adjust to the minor fixes in the DoJ report. But he is a Gorelick puppet. He played games with OUR lives. If you want my guess he was one of the sources for the NY Times article which is why he is out there now making waves. This is all pure BS.
Addendum: For all those who keep throwing Comey’s titles out as if that bestows saintly qualities, in this town (DC) everyone has impressive titles. And way too many of them fall to the corruption of power and media attention. For those who need a reminder Comey is not US Representative (like Randy “Duke” Cunningham) so by the title measure he should be less saintly in his lowly position – by comparison. Heck, President is the top title in this country and we all know that doesn’t bestow purity. The titles may sound impressive – but they are all people with their fallacies. Comey is a hack because he ran to Congress and the media to ‘tell his story’ – yet no one else there has had that opportunity? Strange? Not in this town. DC is a brutal power game. The career inhabitants are the worst of the bunch at times. Anyone who pretends otherwise is seriously naive.
Wow, yet another “scandal” we’re supposed to get all outraged about — as reported by the same media that Ace of Spades blasted so thoroughly yesterday for being “biased” to the point where they stampede to apologize to Left bloggers but apparently don’t listen to, don’t read, and possibly don’t even know about Right bloggers, including Instapundit.
Why take the media seriously when they keep crying wolf like this?
I seriously doubt that the Democrats’ low polling numbers will improve even after Bush leaves the office.
Unfortunately, some people still believe the mainstream media.
What can we do to make the conservative blogs known to the American Public?
Advertisement?
I think this Comey is connected to Schumer. Clarice will know. I think that it is through Comey that this whole probe got started in the first place.
“What a tangled web we weave, when we seek first to deceive.”
Clarice will tell us the truth. I wonder what soros has on the WaPo?
The Kool-Aid Krew is up in arms about James Comey blowing the lid off the patent illegality of Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program. In order to place the issue in proper perspective, however, it is necessary to provide a brief background precis:
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 made ANY warrantless wiretapping a felony under the law. No exceptions. The statue is a model of clarity. The FISA Act, however, provided ample opportunity for lawful wiretapping by permitting the government to place a tap for up to 72 hours before seeking a warrant, and the special FISA court has been exceedingly accomodating to governmental requests: of 5,000 + warrant request, only a handful (4-5) have ever been denied.
The Bush Administration, however, was unwilling to comply with this law (as with many others), insisting that the powers of the mythical Unitary Executive made the president above the law. However, as a CYA maneuver, the Administration claimed that having a lapdog Attorney General issue a bogus certification in effect legalized what was actually a conspiracy to violate federal law, specifically Title 50 Chapter 36 of the United States Code.
Comey’s testimony yesterday revealed that in spite of the fact that AG John Ashcroft and acting AG James Comey refused to sign the certification, the Bush Administration proceeded to wiretap without warrants, committing a series of felonies. As § 1809 of the Act states clearly:
Comey testified President Bush intervened in March 2004 to avert a crisis over the National Security Agency’s domestic eavesdropping program after Attorney General John Ashcroft, Director Robert S. Mueller III of the F.B.I. and other senior Justice Department aides threatened to resign. Bush quelled the revolt over the program’s legality by allowing it to continue without Justice Department approval, also directing department officials to take the necessary steps to bring it into compliance with the law.
Important Note: Bush directed officials to bring it into compliance – an admission that it was NOT compliant at the time. This is the proverbial smoking gun. The Administration knew it was not in compliance -and went ahead anyway.
Keep in mind, all they ever had to do was ask for a warrant – it would have been granted. Instead, heedless of the law and arrogant to a fault – they committed a series of felonies – with each wiretap a separate count with a penalty of up to 5 years in prisono and a $10,000 fine. The very definition of a high crime or misdemeanor.
As for the coming smear of Comey – his credentials are impeccable:
Clearly a left-wing pinko – Lockheed Martin just loves to hire commie lawyers.
soothie
Then why isn’t the media scream HIGH CRIMES at the top of their lungs? They want to “GET” Bush as much as you do so why are they silent if what you say is true?
Hint: because it is not true
You can slabber all over your keyboard until Jan 2009 and it is not going to make a differnce. There is NO there there.
On a lighter side: I hope you realize this makes YOU dumber than Bush because he has outsmarted you!! You can’t and will not “get” him. You are dumber than he is. How’s it feels? ROTFLMAO!!!!!
SS: What’s this I hear about you being a sock puppet, is this true?
Don’t be so sure Bush can’t be got.
A poll published May 8y shows that close to 40% of Americans favor the impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney:
It’s early yet – and the tide is building. Once Republicans realize the only wat to get elected in ’08 is to repudiate Bush . . . it’ll be open season on the criminals Bush & Cheney.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
Soothie
You are a chameleon.
A few posts up you were speaking of the proverbial “Smoking Gun”, “High Crimes or misdemeanor”, a series of felonies that were committed and were strutting around like a male peacock. You were are so CONVINCED by your own cock and bull
and all you come back with is a poll? ONE POLL!
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!! 🙂
Where are the news stories screaming about the crimes? Where is the outrage of the MSM?
Not even the NYT or Wapo is taking your bait! lol
Gonzales Now In Trick Box
Former White House Privacy Counsel says Alberto Gonzales may face new legal problems after yesterday’s testimony of former Deputy Attorney General James Comey.
In a 2006 hearing, when asked about Comey’s objections to the NSA wiretapping program, Gonzales denied there was any serious disagreement about the program.
Either Comey’s objections apply to the NSA warrantless wiretapping program that Gonzales was discussing, which means Gonzales lied under oath or Comey’s objections applied to a different domestic spying program.
The latter possibility would be a big advantage for Gonzales beacuse it would mean he wasn’t lying under oath, however, we would then have senior Justice officials confirming that other programs exist for domestic spying, something the Administration has never previously admitted.
Meanwhile, Republican Chuck Hagel cut to the chase:
Laugh some more, Kool-Aid Krew.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
How is your Lefty- Lemon Kool-aid today? I have had kool-aid since my kids were kids!
Americans outside the beltway ain’t interested in Gonzales. This remains a non-scandal story. Big Lizards has a really good writeup showing how wrong Comey is.
Kool-aid going your way, sooth-copperhead.
Go back and read AJStrata’s addendum in above post before you post again about this story, soothie-copperhead.
NO HIGH CRIMES COMMITTED.
Lurker:
During the Libby trial, AJ demonstrated conclusively that he cannot read the law. FISA is clear on this issue – any warrantless wiretap is a felony. Period. The fact that neither Gonzales nor any US Attorney is willing to prosecute is a failure of the enforcement mechanism – not of the law as written, legislated, voted on, passed and signed into law, complete with one of those signing statements so beloved of Dubbya:
Even the literacy challenged should be able to understand that.
SS:
You’ve got to tell me your secret……. how do you get all those kewl bolds and quotes to come out in your posts?????
Comey’s disingenuous testimony…
Pathetic…
“On the night of March 10, 2004, as Attorney General John D. Ashcroft lay ill in an intensive-care unit, his deputy, James B. Comey, received an urgent call.
White House Counsel Alberto R. Gonzales and President Bush’s chief…
Scaulen:
I don’t know if you’re pulling my leg or not . . . but . . . if you really want to know:
for bold it’s left caret ” to activate bold, insert text, and then left caret “” to de-activate.
for blocked quotations – it’s left caret “” to activate; insert text, then left caret “” to de-activate.
Now I have to post to see if the explanation will show up on-screen – cause I don’t know how to preview this set-up . . .
Dang – it didn’t work, sorry. If you want – I’ll e-mail the instructions to you if you want to leave an e-mail address.
Let me try:
Typing <b>bold</b> should get you bold.
Typing <i>italic</i> should get you italic.
Typing <blockquote>stuff in quotes</blockquote> should get you:
Hopefully that worked. (I wish AJ would get this site a “preview” function so I could be sure before clicking “Submit”.)