Apr 04 2007
Thank You Nancy Pelosi
I couldn’t help but pick up on all the fawning over Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Syria coming from just about every terrorist and Islamists organization on the planet. I know many conservatives are angry and upset at Nancy, but Nancy did more to shift support back to conservative national security and towards support of Bush’s policies than I thought possible. The Islamo Fascists are ecstatic over Pelosi’s capitulation. Their common response that Pelosi is the only saviour of peace in the ME and the only one who can avoid US defeat (by ironically negotiating our surrender) is nothing short of astounding.
So why am I so happy? Clearly Bush’s policies and strong positions have everyone of these organizations swarming to Pelosi offering to negotiate because their only other option is DEFEAT! Why are all the Islamo Fascists singing her praise? Well here is their choice: negotiate a truce with Pelosi or sue for terms of surrender with Bush. Pelosi must represent their last hope – why else run to her like this? Why would every terrorist organization claim Pelosi can save the ME when, in fact, it is them who need to be saved? If the US was going to get an ass-whooping they WOULD NOT HESITATE to give us one. If the Islamocists where in a position of strength they would be trying to squeeze Pelosi and America. But they aren’t doing that. They are singing her praises. So it is clear (a) Pelosi is naive enough to think surrender is our only option (b) and not smart enough to see all the praise is an act of desperation from the terrorists! They have only two paths – neither of which is winning against the US. As I said, if they had even a prayer of hitting the Great Satan hard they would take it and bask in the hero’s limelight.
The choice is now clear for America: we can finish the job and pound the terrorists into surrendering on our terms, or we can let Pelosi save them from defeat and negotiate a useless and untenable peace – for the terrorists, they must attack us again later – when they are better prepared. Defeating the West is still the plan. But clearly that requires survival, and the only life raft out there is the one they all jumped on – the Pelosi surrender plan. So, will Americans, now that they see how desperate the terrorists are right now, let them off with negotiating as equals to us or will be now wait the terrorists out until THEY sue for peace. I say pound them until they say ‘uncle’ and promise to never use terrorism again – on pain of total annihilation if they do. Thanks Nancy – I had no idea we had pounded the terrorists so far down that you now look to be their only remaining hope. Whodathunkit!
Even Mort Kondrake on Special Report tonight said if she had just said something “threatening” to Assad he might have been able to justify her trip. She did nothing of the sort and in the process stepped on herself by misquoting Israeli officials.
For her to say she and the President are on the same page here is the biggest joke of all. I suppose that is how the dems now save face when they know they have royally screwed up..what a joke. I agree, finish the job we started or pay the price in this country later.
This photo over at Rusty’s pretty much says it all:
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/PelosiAssadNasrallah.jpg
I would be forever grateful to see the public swing from Democrats to Republicans.
I wonder how many would vote for Reid’s new resolution.
Nope. The fawning press did not bring you the news.
And, nancy still hasn’t learned to STEER. All she knows is that you drop your foot on the gas pedal. And, the road is “yours.” If all you want to do is go down “Special Interests Lanes.”
The person to have watched was Merkel!
In the Israeli papers, they wrote up the article that Abbas was SCREAMING! Seems Merkel has decided it’s in germany’s best interest to side with Israel.
So, yes. I was surprised.
What happened? During Merkel’s visit with Abbas she DEMANDED that Shalit be RETURNED, FIRST! (Now, that’s not something that can be done; because the kid is probably dead.)
But Israel dangled the return of 10,000 prisoners. So? Abbas thought he’d work a fast one. And, learned, instead, that Merkel is NOT condi!
Sure. It puts a whole new slant on things; IF Israel gets help from the german’s. Because no one would have expected this. (She also gets real help from Poland. The Poles have been tremendously helpful to Jews.) Which means? Some people recover from the losses brought to them by going whole hog with anti-Semitism. Only to lose.
Losing, however, for Abbas is a way of life.
As to pelosi, the light green suit looks nice. Nicer still is to see women wearing pants. Too bad, though, she needs Botox to hold up her face. And, she dyes her hair.
If, in politics, you absolutely MUST face opponents, people should feel gratitude to the donks inability to field much.
In another arena, Drudge would point out to the stupidities inherent in Hollywood; where they’d pick Jennifer Anison to open movies. ALL THE MOVIES FLOPPED!
Sometimes? People learn when they’re losing money.
Not so in politics. And, not so, it seems within the House of Saud. They thought they bought Dubya, lock, stock, and stinker. But he’s incapable of transferring real estate to their possession.
Will the face of the Mideast change? Yup. Moving into Iraq proved productive. And, educational value-added, to our military. Getting out from under the thumb of the House of Saud? Practically a reality. But they can always have Tony Baloney Blair. See if I care?
I find it incredible that when even the UN thinks that Syria is a terrorist, murder-sponsoring state, the leader of the Democrats in Congress basks in the glory of her alliance with Syria in working for the so-called peaceful release of the UK hostages.
What can one say when the “loyal”opposition and the MSM work so hard to have the world be grateful to a bunch of crooks and thugs?
I find no other word to describe the situation except for: SEDITION !!!
EVERYBODY SHOULD READ THIS FROM FREEREPUBLIC.COM
Nuclear Iran?
Â
Posted by Nasty McPhilthy
On News/Activism 04/04/2007 7:20:47 PM PDT
Hillsdale College/Imprimis ^ | April 2007 | Victor Davis Hanson
“The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of a war of destiny. The outcome of hundreds of years of war will be defined in Palestinian land. As the Imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map.†So rants Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It is understandable why Ahmadinejad might want an arsenal of nuclear missiles. It would allow him to shake down a constant stream of rich European emissaries, pressure the Arab Gulf states to lower oil production, pose as the Persian and Shiite messianic leader of Islamic terrorists, neutralize the influence of the United States in the region—and,…
“I would be forever grateful to see the public swing from Democrats to Republicans.”
The problem is that today’s 18year old has been hearing nothing but Bush Bashing from TV and other entertainment since the 2000 election … when they were 12.
I don’t think the Democrats have the stomach for the world that is to come.
Democrats, lightweights.
Neurotics, victims, character disordered, boundary challenged…I could go on.
Nancy negotiated the release of the Brits? Does she not realize that it was not Syria who took them but Iran? Oh, but she does and that means she knows she was pandering to the enemy. Not even when Clinton was in office would we have seen something like this. Slick Willie ain’ t that stupid.
I do not have the link, but I saved the text. I saw this posted by Jeffrey Hadden:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi seems to be confused about the office she holds. She is the speaker, not the president. She is traveling in the Middle East, and intends to go to Syria with “great hope” for reviving U.S. relations with that nation, the Associated Press reports.
That is not her role. Article II, section 2 of the Constitution grants treaty making power to the president, and ratification to the Senate. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., which is still the law of the land, made it clear that:
“In this vast external realm (of foreign affairs), with its important, complicated, delicate and manifold problems, the President alone has the power to speak or listen as a representative of the nation. He makes treaties with the advice and consent of the Senate; but he alone negotiates. Into the field of negotiation the Senate cannot intrude; and Congress itself is powerless to invade it.”
The speaker is getting ahead of herself. We only have one president at a time in this country.
crosspatch:
But the average 18 year old does not watch that kind of TV. I saw a survey linked to that was done by UCLA and the vast majority of the respondents did not even know who Pelosi was, and only 40% knew that Cheney was the VP. Makes you wonder.
From an editorial at the WAPO – hardly a Republican paper about Ms Pelosi’s Pratfall in Damascus.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/04/AR2007040402306.html
Excerpt:
As any diplomat with knowledge of the region could have told Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Assad is a corrupt thug whose overriding priority at the moment is not peace with Israel but heading off U.N. charges that he orchestrated the murder of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri. The really striking development here is the attempt by a Democratic congressional leader to substitute her own foreign policy for that of a sitting Republican president. Two weeks ago Ms. Pelosi rammed legislation through the House of Representatives that would strip Mr. Bush of his authority as commander in chief to manage troop movements in Iraq. Now she is attempting to introduce a new Middle East policy that directly conflicts with that of the president. We have found much to criticize in Mr. Bush’s military strategy and regional diplomacy. But Ms. Pelosi’s attempt to establish a shadow presidency is not only counterproductive, it is foolish.
Republican congressman admits Bush has dropped the ball:
Dateline: Damascus
It doesn’t matter, martin / soothie. Bush did NOT drop the ball. The Founding Fathers established that the US President is the ONLY one having the authority to manage foreign policies. If Bush does not want to deal with Syria, it’s his every right. Pelosi and his team violated the US Constitution if they did far more than fact-finding. And they are doing more than fact-finding but they won’t admit to it.
As AJStrata points out in his post, Pelosi made several serious blunders.
And many experts advise against dialogue with Syria at this point.
“Excerpt from the WaPo editorial exposing Pelosi’s foolishness:
“As any diplomat with knowledge of the region could have told Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Assad is a corrupt thug whose overriding priority at the moment is not peace with Israel but heading off U.N. charges that he orchestrated the murder of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri. The really striking development here is the attempt by a Democratic congressional leader to substitute her own foreign policy for that of a sitting Republican president. Two weeks ago Ms. Pelosi rammed legislation through the House of Representatives that would strip Mr. Bush of his authority as commander in chief to manage troop movements in Iraq. Now she is attempting to introduce a new Middle East policy that directly conflicts with that of the president. We have found much to criticize in Mr. Bush’s military strategy and regional diplomacy. But Ms. Pelosi’s attempt to establish a shadow presidency is not only counterproductive, it is foolish.”
Foolish.”
http://www.nypost.com/seven/04052007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/diplo_show_turns_into_damascus_a___kiss_opedcolumnists_john_podhoretz.htm
How naive to think that some republicans are playing on the same team as the President.
There is one commander in chief as there is one CEO of a corporation. The strategies of foreigh policy employed are built on ONE leader and only one leader. Once again, the democrats are trying to shred our constitution and our traditions, which have endured many more enemies than them and will endure many more in the future.
But dems are just desperate and are trying to overcome their utter incompetence..Hello Nancy? Olmert is really,really mad at you. But, you don’t care, we know.
And I can tell you, if you want to talk about fund-raising THIS is a boom for republicans.
Even the Washington Post is calling Pelosi an idiot. It really takes some doing if the flagship propaganda rag for the DNC makes you look like a ninny.
AJStrata, what do you think about Hastert?
Read the sublinks here:
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/04/hastert-colombia/
soothsayer:
The Republicans that went over there were not going out of their way to undermine their own government. Pelosi is acting like a rich, spoiled, silly woman who has let a little power go to her head.