Nov 13 2006

Dems Plan To Protect…. Terrorists

Published by at 10:14 pm under All General Discussions,Bin Laden/GWOT

Democrats seemed prepared to do their worst quickly. They have no idea what we are facing with the terrorism. Murtha wants to bring troops home so he can buy votes with Federal handouts, apparently oblivious to the resulting boost that kind of retreat will give to Al Qaeda. And now Carl Levin is more interested in investigating if any known terrorist we captured was interrogate too roughly instead of investigating ways to protect us from the next 9-11. Are they really that irresponsible? Guess so.

11 responses so far

11 Responses to “Dems Plan To Protect…. Terrorists”

  1. kathie says:

    The definition of patriotism is putting country before political ambition—–country before party. The Democrats are a domestic party.

    The whole Bush thing the dems have been spewing for 5 years is not so much about hating Bush but about hating the power this country showed in taking out Afghanistan and then Iraq. Look to see where the dems turn now, the victims of our power, the guys at Guantanimo who have been roughed up. Dems only feel powerful when they can help a victim. Even now with Murtha really saying why he wants to get out of Iraq so we can get back to a domestic agenda, you would think some one who interviews him would ask if this is the best course for the nation. No one asks. Why, because the reporters are so superficial, so uninformed, so lacking in talent for investigation that they can only talk about what has been fed to them in talking points. It’s not because we are stretched to thin, or because we can’t put pressure on Iran or North Korea, it’s about buying votes at home. It’s about universal health care, it’s about making sure this nation will never be able to do anything to protect ourselves ever again, because we will not have a fighting force because the defence budget will be spent on health care.

    All the investigations are about discrediting the President and the United States of America so that we will never be able to project power ever again, we will never be trusted to help except with blue helmets—–we will be no better then France.

  2. kathie says:

    PS Levin says he wants to make us more secure so we need these investigations—–how much more secure can you get then no attacks. People believe these guys? It is not about security it is about the HUMILIATION OF THIS COUNTRY FOR ALL THE WORLD TO SEE. Now if that doesn’t make you sick.

  3. Mark78 says:

    Please read this.
    Newly elected Democrat Congressman and former Pentagon advisor: Saddam had links to al-Qaeda, all regional terrorist groups….

  4. apache_ip says:


    You are 100% correct. It is the “Hate America” crowd, and yes, it does make me sick.

    How the f*!k can an American hate this country? I just don’t get it. I feel like an outsider looking in and what I see is can best be described as a loony bin.

    Apache IP

  5. kathie says:

    At is a letter that Levin wrote to President Clinton that is worth reading, CONCERN OVER RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN IRAQ (Senate – October 09, 1998)

    HON. CARL LEVIN in the Senate

  6. Christoph says:


    Please have a read over this article from the Michael Coren in the National Post.

    Discussing an interview with Dr. Tawfik Hamid, MD, author and activist once was a member of Egypt’s Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya. He was trained under Ayman al-Zawahiri and has great insights into the motivations behind Sunni suicide/homicide bombers.

    He’s a disarmingly gentle and courteous man. But he’s determined to tell a complacent North America what he knows about fundamentalist Muslim imperialism.

    “Yes, ‘imperialism,’ ” he tells me. “The deliberate and determined expansion of militant Islam and its attempt to triumph not only in the Islamic world but in Europe and North America. Pure ideology. Muslim terrorists kill and slaughter not because of what they experience but because of what they believe.”

    From a position of experience, he goes on to demollish the canards of the left:

    “I’ve heard this poverty nonsense time and time again from Western apologists for Islam, most of them not Muslim by the way. There are millions of passive supporters of terror who may be poor and needy but most of those who do the killing are wealthy, privileged, educated and free. If it were about poverty, ask yourself why it is middle-class Muslims — and never poor Christians — who become suicide bombers in Palestine.”

    But then, he gets into the controversial meat of his thesis, something that’s taboo to discuss in the national media.

    He leans back, takes a deep breath and moves to another area, one that he says is far too seldom discussed: “North Americans are too squeamish about discussing the obvious sexual dynamic behind suicide bombings. If they understood contemporary Islamic society, they would understand the sheer sexual tension of Sunni Muslim men. Look at the figures for suicide bombings and see how few are from the Shiite world. Terrorism and violence yes, but not suicide. The overwhelming majority are from Sunnis. Now within the Shiite world there are what is known as temporary marriages, lasting anywhere from an hour to 95 years. It enables men to release their sexual frustrations.

    and later:

    This partial explanation is shocking more for its banality than its horror. Mass murder provoked partly by simple lust. But it cannot be denied that letters written by suicide bombers frequently dwell on waiting virgins and sexual gratification.

    It’s a fascinating read. What is your take on it?

  7. Carol J says:

    I almost choked on my english muffin this morning when I was watching FOX & Friends and they had a statement from C.R.E.W. (anybody remember them?) basically saying that Murtha should NOT be House Majority Leader and blasting Pelosi for suggesting whom they called one of the most CORRUPT congressmen in Washington! Yes, you heard right! They called him a “pay-to-play” corrupt politician! Listen up Nancy! You’re party is speaking its mind.


  8. Carol J says:

    More on the above…John Murtha is tainted goods:

    I wonder how Nancy will be able to blow this off…after all, she said that this was like a “high school student government election” and it will be forgotten in a couple of weeks or so. Yeah right, Nancy. With CREW and the Blue Dog Dems on your butt…I don’t think so.


  9. Barbara says:

    The dems have said all along that they would do this. Even if the electorate only read or heard the media they knew this which is why I am stunned that they elected these scumbags. Maybe the majority did neither though and just voted democrat for the hell of it.

  10. Ken says:

    All of you piling on Murtha–unlike the Republican Randy Cunningham, ex war hero and current war hawk, Murtha, ex war hero and current war dove…. has a clean record.

  11. Barbara says:


    I believe Randy Cunningham is gone and in jail. Murtha is still with us and still in congress. Your point?