Mar 10 2006

What Did We Lose In DPW Debacle?

Published by at 8:18 am under All General Discussions,UAE-DPW

** updates continue at the end **

We lost more security world wide. Recall DPW operates a lot of ports sending goods here to the US. They are our first line of defense for stopping WMDs being smuggled in. Here is just a fraction of what we lost:

Until Rove’s decision, Dubai’s business leaders had insisted they would fight on. The chairman of Dubai Ports World, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, told me emphatically on Wednesday that his company would do whatever was necessary to convince Congress that the deal posed no security risk — new investment, additional equipment, more scanning of cargo, special checks of UAE personnel, including himself. But that was before the House Appropriations Committee voted 62 to 2 to kill the deal.

Well, are we safer now? Of course not. The Chicken Hawks who could not handle more (not new) UAE business in the US Port market had to panic and toss away UAE funded security equipment and stepped up scanning of containers. Wasn’t one of the lame excuses we heard from the mob we needed to increase our inspection of cargo?

This is what happens when people run around on emotion, especially fear. They don’t think. More:

I suspect America will pay a steep price for Congress’s rejection of this deal. It sent a message that for all the U.S. rhetoric about free trade and partnerships with allies, America is basically hostile to Arab investment. And it shouldn’t be surprising if Arab investors respond in kind. One could blame it all on craven members of Congress, if the opinion polls didn’t show that Americans are overwhelmingly against the deal — and suspicious of Muslims in general. Those poll numbers tell us that America hasn’t gotten over Sept. 11, 2001. If anything, Iraq has deepened the country’s anxiety, introspection and foreboding.

Yep, we are running scared. And Al Qaeda sees it too. And they must be rejoicing that spooked Americans rejected what Al Qaeda deems a major enemy to them, and now they will use this to rally support and make the case America can be beat. They will say America is in retreat now – we only need to kill a few more.

Never show weakness to animals. Even Chicken Hawks should know that. But of course what do you expect from people who just finished sending friendly fire into our ally and weakening them and us our efforts fighting terrorists.

To appreciate how cockeyed America’s Dubai-phobia is, you have to spend a little time here, as I did this week. The truth is, this is one of the few places in the Arab world where things have been going in the right direction — away from terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism and toward an open, modern economy. That’s why congressional opposition came as such a surprise here. People in the UAE think they’re America’s friends.

Read the whole sad story.

Update: An excellent round up on the DPW disaster at RCP. A sad must read.

Update: Oh, in case you missed it, we now are at war with those ‘fereigners’, not Al Qaeda:

The decision by Dubai Ports World to abandon its effort to take over terminal operations at six U.S. seaports was a victory for the numerous politicians who have thundered in recent days that foreign companies have no business handling U.S. port operations.

Now all we have to do is round them up and drop them off over the boarder. Here’s are first target – more Ayrabs!

For an example of the industry’s international nature, consider Inchcape Shipping Services, a London-based company that provides ship agency services — arranging the smooth arrival and departure of vessels — at 200 ports around the world, including more than two dozen in the United States. Inchcape was purchased in January by a Dubai company whose chief executive, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, also heads Dubai Ports World.

How did Schumer and King, those Arab-Slaying Chicken Hawks, allow this to happen? Where are all those brave Congress people? They should march on these heathen port operations right now! Some one alert Michelle Malkin. We need Ann Coulter down their telling these ‘ragheads’ where their place is.

Update: Well, well. It seems Michelle is already out hunting for more feriegners:

And yes, I agree, it’s time for a wholesale reassessment of all other foreign government-owned or -operated critical assets in the U.S. We should have done it a lot sooner. That’s not called xenophobia. That’s called dealing with post-Sept. 11 reality.

The reality being, of course, Michelle is afraid of Ayrab businessmen. And I am not the only one seeing this:

PROTECTIONISTS, REJOICE! The dastardly United Arab Emirates company that would have presumed to unload containers of underwear and toothpaste on U.S. soil has backed down, and it will now divest its U.S. port interests to an American entity. Rest assured, the nation is now safe from dangerous Middle Eastern accountants and port logistics specialists.

Thank GOD we have all been saved!

Update: Congress wins the Dodo award! For killing our economy by making it harder to negotiate trade deals, by lsoing out on serious security enhancements DPW was bringing to the deal, and for generally making is all look frightened.

13 responses so far

13 Responses to “What Did We Lose In DPW Debacle?”

  1. Karig says:

    Somehow I suspect the mob will disperse at this point. They won’t follow through on their threat to kick all foreigners out of our ports, because at some point the lobbyists will show up on Capitol Hill to complain before such a plan gets very far. I don’t think we’re even going to make life harder for the National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia, which has been working here in the U.S. since 1979 (IIRC). No, I imagine that the passion has been spent, and the U.A.E. will be left with the impression that we have a big problem with THEM in particular.

  2. HaroldHutchison says:

    Michelle Malkin clearly has trouble telling friend from foe.

    The troops the UAE sent to Afghanistan would have been just as dead as Pat Tillman had the Taliban or al-Qaeda successfully attacked them.

    When someone judges by ethnicity and religion rather than conduct, there is no better word to describe their thought process than bigotry.

  3. AJStrata says:


    This is out of control of the lobbyists and Congressmen. The precendent is set and the protectionist have a large agenda they have wanted enacted for a long, long time. This small win will not satiate them.

  4. patch says:

    The worst is yeat to come…

    The UAE will shortly announce the winner of a $9 billion aircraft purchase.

    Boeing was the leading cnadidate. Want to bet that Airbus is now the company of choice? Hope Denny Hastert feels really good.

    This is just the tip of the iceberg. Moderate Arab and moderate Islamic countries will now deal with others rather than trust the the USA.

    It’s called a “Pyrhic” victory. Oh yeah, my bad, noone studies the classics anymore.

    What a bunch of maroons…


  5. MerryJ1 says:

    I didn’t get full information, but it looks as though a leading contender to buy the port business is the same Miami company which, via a letter from the Miami mayor (on behalf of the longshoreman’s union), set off the UAE kerfuffle in the first place.

    That isn’t gospel, as I said I didn’t get full details. But if true, it makes me want to throw up.

  6. AJStrata says:


    I predicted that would be the case. I believe the same company donated to Schumer’s and King’s campaigns.

    So they were bribed. Big surprise.

  7. HaroldHutchison says:

    Maybe demand a bribery investigation. Sounds like a quid pro quo occured. And the consequences (a betrayed ally) are far, far, worse than anything Duke Cunningham did (some earmarked defense contracts).

  8. az redneck says:

    and to think that i just sent the RNC a check for the 1st time ever!!!

  9. Of Ports and Whines, Part 12 – Dubai Ports Post M…

    Real Clear Politics has a big print media roundup, with the following summary statement that echoes my sentiments:…

  10. HaroldHutchison says:

    Oops. Forgot to close a tag…

  11. Cooper says:

    All I can say is – the U.S. “entity” that will now take the place of the UAE better not have one single whisper of a skeleton in their closet. Not one. Malkin better be prepared to set more policy for potential port investors/operators. Because we all know how lily-white-pure all U.S. Companies are. Maybe she can make a list of enitities she personally has investigated and approved and get it to GW’s hands asap, that he way he can hit the ground running if the new “entity” fails utterly – which it appears might be happening.

  12. Dubai Ports, The Deal Is Dead…

    Bush Administration and their arrogant, cavalier attitude toward this deal does not install confidence, and to have threatened with a veto had to be the biggest ‘icing on the cake’ blunder of all. Karl Rove, who seems to have the instincts of a turtl…

  13. More DPW Post Mortem…

    From Tom Bevan at RCP:The DPW Post Mortem So the deal is dead. I think the emotion behind the issue was understandable, though misplaced. Turning away Dubai may or may not have long term economic and foreign policy ramifications, but…