Feb 27 2006
Saddam Was A Threat
Saddam had WMDs and an interest to use them covertly.
Democrats believed we could trust Saddam with his WMD technology and terrorist ties.
That’s all you ever need to think about when voting this fall.
Feb 27 2006
Published by AJStrata at 11:16 am under All General Discussions
Saddam had WMDs and an interest to use them covertly.
Democrats believed we could trust Saddam with his WMD technology and terrorist ties.
That’s all you ever need to think about when voting this fall.
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
« Apr | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 | 31 |
WordPress Theme Shop | Web Hosting GeeksThe Strata-Sphere Copyright © 2024 All Rights Reserved .
Saddam had WMDs?…
Even if there were no WMDs, going into Iraq was still a good idea. This is just icing on the cake. But damn, is it good icing….
I’m confident that sooner or later we’re going to find out where the WMD’s are or what happened to them, and I hope it’s sooner rather than later and that they haven’t already fallen into the wrong hands. The fact that the Administration doesn’t seem anxious to find out disturbs me more than a little. There’s something that just doesn’t smell right.
Here is a Feb 8, 2006 article by Laurie Mylroie on the WMD
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=21209
Tierney’s documentation about the WMD is here. Also the origional Arabic.
http://www.intelligencesummit.org/
Just scroll down a bit.
The discussions between Saddam and his minions is a bit hard to understand because they talk in this flowery allusive prose.
Tierney gave a literal translation on the screen, but then interpreted what they really meant.