Sep 19 2007

Idiotic Leftwing With Eyes Shut Tightly

Published by at 12:21 pm under All General Discussions,Iraq

This is so dumb I could not pass it up:

U.S. Kills Terror Boss: Who Cares?

My question for the general was, “Does it matter?” Despite all the terrorist and insurgent leaders we’ve killed in four years, the insurgency only appears to be growing. Killing Saddam’s sons didn’t make a difference. Killing Abu Musab al-Zarqawi last summer didn’t help much.

Boy, is this person a lost fool. Who cares? I would say the thousands of Iraqi families for whom this man is responsible for killing or maiming one or more of their beloved members. How about the people of Anbar who are now free of al-Qaeda, while al-Qaeda’s leaders now lie decomposing in the sands of Iraq? How about all the thousands FUTURE victims of this animal and his fellow jackals could have killed if he was still alive?

What difference does it make? Check out 6 years with no attack in the US because these people spent their every waking moment LOSING in Iraq and not plotting attacks here. I am sure the death of this man is being cheered across Iraq, and this fool just doesn’t get it! Trust me when I note this kind of announcement of sheer ignorance is NOT rebounding against the effort in Iraq. It is solely a sign of why the left is a lost and losing cause in America. Not to worry, they will lose. It just won’t be Iraq, it we be here. I mean, how else do you deal with blindered fools who refuse to see our successes?

Violence is ebbing in Iraq and has dipped to the lowest level in 18 months, US military spokesman in Iraq Major General Kevin Bergner said on Wednesday.

“While Iraq remains a violent place beset by many problems, it is a less violent place than it was last winter,” Bergner told a press conference in Baghdad.

“Since the surge operations began 13 weeks ago, the overall security incidents throughout Iraq have followed a downward trend,” he said, referring to a US troop “surge” which began in mid-February.

“It is now the lowest level of incidents since March 2006,” Bergner said.

Clearly al-Qaeda is not growing stronger. It has lost all of its strongholds, two declared capitols in Iraq in a year, and are being decimated. Not to mention their replacement recruits are drying up on them. There is a wave of success crashing across Iraq, the dynamic is very powerful and I wager irreversible given al-Qaeda’s penchant for bloody atrocities. Just because some fool in America cannot grasp it doesn’t mean it is not happening. It simply means he is ignorant of the facts on the ground. Better question: who cares what lefties in deep denial think????

7 responses so far

7 Responses to “Idiotic Leftwing With Eyes Shut Tightly”

  1. AJ: this should not be a surprise, you have the “Bootlicker” as a regular poster, and this has been his Anti-American/Pro-Jihadi Leftist Nutbag tack for years!

    “What does it matter…?

    That’s Bootlicker; alright.

    In fact, Bootlicker, like the Moonbat Kos’ians, actually advocates for the deaths of MORE American’s in combat, to further their evil Anti-American/Pro-Jihadi/Traitorous political agenda!

  2. Terrye says:

    I see, so why go after any criminal? Child molestors, serial killers, mass murderers…there will always be more.

    What an idiotic comment.

  3. Terrye: you’ve summed up the Left’s entire Moral Relativism, Moral Equivalency, Everybody is a hypocrite, so in fact, they can’t have any opinions on anything approach to everything.

    When Leftist Nutbags like “Bootlicker” get their way; sex with children will be okay; there will be no morals, values, ethics, integrity; everything and anything will be acceptable, if it “feels good, and you feel comfortable with yourself for doing it…”

    Their entire agenda is Gay Sex, Child Sex, Drugs, Animal Sex, Group Sex, Torture, Rape, S&M and whatever else you want to do, so long as it’s “cool”, and it’s between “consenting” partners (notice I didn’t say “adults”)!

    That’s the agenda, get used to it!

  4. Soothsayer says:

    Speaking of moral relativism, is that like Petraeus showing up wearing a medal he didn’t deserve? When he was paraded before Congress like the tail-end of a dog & pony show, he was wearing a Bronze Star with V which you’re only supposed to get if you have been in combat under fire.

    Petraeus graduated the Point in ’74. The first time he saw any action was 29 years later, as a 2-star in Iraq, and the only “action” he saw was when one mortar round landed between 40 and 50 meters away from Generals Petraeus and Wallace as they read a map on the hood of a Humvee.

    The medal in question is a Bronze Star with Valor Device, the fourth-highest award we have for combat valor. That “Valor Device” specifies combat valor and makes it an entirely different medal from the Bronze Star for Meritorious Conduct.

    Unlike general Dwight D. Eisenhower, who also entered command not having seen combat and was not awarded – and did not let himself be awarded – a medal for combat valor, Petraeus snarked it up, thus ratifying Adm. Fallon’s evaluation of him as “an a**-kissing little chickens***.”

  5. Terrye says:

    Sooth:

    How can you say he did not deserve that medal? That is so typical of the left, the man has spent 35 years in the military, the Democrats voted for him to get the job and no one even hinted he did not deserve it, until he failed to say what certain people wanted to hear.

    People like you are a gift to Republicans, you really are.

  6. Terrye says:

    Notice how now we have gone from the chicken hawk argument in which it is necessary to have served in the military and have moved along to the new position where decades in the military are not enough if you have not been shot at.

    So what about McCain? He has served, been shot at, been locked up and he still believes in his country? Does he count?

  7. Soothsayer says:

    How can you say he did not deserve that medal?