Aug 25 2006

Nagin Is A Typical Democrat

Published by at 9:40 am under All General Discussions

Nagin’s brutish and politically opportunistic stab at NY City and the 9-11 attacks is classic leftwing rhetoric. On the left, ever since Carville and Begala, the more crass you are the more impressive you are. I am with John McIntyre, the comments are infuriating. Katrina was nature disaster – no once called the storm down from the heavens and Nagin and Blanco are responsible for not acting correctly. They threw out the disaster response plans, leaving both Federal and State authorities in a lurch. 9-11 was not a natural disaster, it was an attack on our country. Comparing the two is ridiculous. Calling the result of 9-11 a ‘whole in the ground’ is a low brow, cheap shot. And I have not heard any Democrats crying foul.

4 responses so far

4 Responses to “Nagin Is A Typical Democrat”

  1. carol johnson says:

    “Calling the result of 9-11 a ‘whole in the ground’ is a low brow, cheap shot. And I have not heard any Democrats crying foul.”

    …..

    And you won’t either. I cannot believe that the people of New Orleans put that man back in office. They’ve seen the last of charity from me unless its clothes or canned goods. NOT ONE MORE DIME!!

    Carol

  2. pull says:

    These are the kinds of divisive scumbags that are destroying this country.

    The whole Katrina mess is one of the most despicable examples of Left wing politics out there. One article pointed out Spike Lee’s picture considered seriously an idea the levee’s were intentionally bombed.

    New Orleans, itself, is a prime example of a once grand city destroying itself. The architecture there and jazz, the food, the sites, and much of the culture is fascinating. What do the people do? They destroy it with crime. New Orleans was destroyed long before Katrina and it was destroyed by their own citizens.

    I don’t think everyone is to blame in that city, but a lot of people are. You can’t blame your own criminality on people in Ohio or California. Your city is your city.

    They do have some legitimate criticisms to make. Any kind of situation like this, you are going to have legitimate criticisms. The legitimate criticisms are all lost in the deluge of lies, cover-ups, and finger pointing.

    As for the whole racist claim, that is just sickening. The biggest racists in New Orleans are their own people. These people are trained to let the murderers go free and blame the murder on someone they know didn’t do it just because they are white.

    It is really sickening. But, they make their pot, they are the ones to sit in it.

  3. streeter says:

    Stop judging Mayor Nagin. What he meant to say: ” the hole in NY that Bush conspired to create has not yet been repaired.”

  4. pull says:

    “Stop judging Mayor Nagin. What he meant to say: ” the hole in NY that Bush conspired to create has not yet been repaired.” ”

    Personally, I really did not say anything about the little devil according to that statement. That was in poor taste, sure, but that is not, by far, the most nasty thing he has said.

    I used the word “divisive” with him. I pointed out guys like him are destroying this country. True. True judgement. With solid evidence. Which is available to anyone familiar with the man.

    Is anybody unaware of the racist statements he has made? Is anybody unaware of the fact that he has been using the disaster to further his own career? That he has used racism to hide his own misdeeds with this whole affair? He has been appealing to racist instincts to hide his own misdeeds. It has worked. It is disgusting.

    This was a disaster. It was not manmade. Today, it is said to be manmade as a plot of the white man against the black man. Somehow, the white man made this hurricane pour out down upon the black man, according to Naginists… heh. It is almost funny if the results of such slanderous lies were not so horrendous to our country.

    Oh, and slanderous lies are the kinds of wrong judgements people make which they should not make. You make a judgement that is right, there is no condemnation. You slander, there is condemnation. You should try and understand the Bible before “misquoting” it next time.